He picks up on three themes: first, that mastery is the “slow carpentering of fragments into a harmonious whole”. The expert creates the illusion of something unified by learning each tiny step – whether those steps are the small melodic ideas of a jazz pianist or the rhythmic pattern of a boxer’s jabs.
Second, mastery is about humanity, not perfection. “We never really love an artist’s virtuosity, or if we do, it feels empty,” Gopnik writes. “We love their vibrato, their … way of entangling their learned virtuosity within their unique vulnerability.”
Third, it’s not about “life rules, but real lives”. Gopnik thinks mastery can be found everywhere, from his mother’s kitchen to his driving teacher’s car. “We always overestimate the space between very good and uniquely good,” Gopnik says: we know the names of the Michael Jordans and the Leonardos, but there are countless people who are nearly, if not quite equally, brilliant. And even if most of us won’t become household names, “we are all more varied and capable than we are often allowed to seem”.
— Matthew Cantor, from “The Real Work: On The Mystery of Mastery” by Adam Gopnik book review – the art of expertise” (The Guardian, March 4, 2023)
Notes:
- Adam Gopnik bio
- Portrait of Adam Gupnik by photographer Alana Paterson in NUVO
I love this perspective on what mastery is, especially that it is imperfect because we are human and that it can be found anywhere
Yes. That was the punch line for me too Beth.
“…we are all more varied and capable than we are often allowed to seem.” Believe this so deeply. We all have something special to offer.
Yes!
Now that’s refreshing! I’m with Lori 💐
So true and so strange and heartening!
Yes. Well said!
“We always overestimate the space between very good and uniquely good,”
I keep coming back to this. How he said uniquely good and didn’t say excellent.
Thank you for sharing, David. Happy Monday.
Happy Monday Sawsan!
Appreciate what provokes our usual thinking…how unfortunate when we allow our evaluations get in the way of simply enjoying.
So agree Valerie!
Excellent post David. Really hits home. I chased “perfection“ for decades before I realized that I was beating myself up if my “high quality work” did not achieve my own definition of “perfect“. This concept should be taught at a young age… if I had understood this early I would not have abandoned some projects that did not meet my own personal definition of “perfect“, but I could still do reasonably well. In addition, my self-esteem would have been much better, which is something I struggle with to this day.
Have a great day, everyone!
That’s it Paul. Right there. Thanks for sharing!
<
div dir=”ltr”>
<
blockquote type=”cite”>
Far too late out of the gate to offer anything particularly worthwhile – my curiosity about people, what makes them tick – to me most people are extraordinary. It occasionally disappoints, but more often than not, I am awed by some quality or qualities each person has. It’s not as Pollyanna-ish as it sounds, though admittedly I’m easily wowed.
As I age, I find this view increasingly important, real and validated. Yes!
<
div dir=”ltr”>
<
blockquote type=”cite”>