Monday Morning Wake-Up Call

…In the 25 years since I graduated from college, such demands have relentlessly ratcheted up. The quantity and complexity of the mental work expected of successful students and professionals have mounted; we’ve responded by pushing ever harder on that lump of gray matter in our heads.

The result has not been a gratifying bulking up of our neural “muscle.” On the contrary, all the mental effort we’ve mustered over the past year has left many of us feeling depleted and distracted, unequal to the tasks that never stop arriving in our inboxes. When the work we’re putting in doesn’t produce the advertised rewards, we’re inclined to find fault with ourselves. Maybe we’re insufficiently gritty; maybe, we think, we’re just not smart enough. But this interpretation is incorrect. What we’re coming up against are universal limits, constraints on the biological brain that are shared by every human on the planet. Despite the hype, our mental endowment is not boundlessly powerful or endlessly plastic. The brain has firm limits — on its ability to remember, its capacity to pay attention, its facility with abstract and nonintuitive concepts — and the culture we have created for ourselves now regularly exceeds these limits.

The escalating mental demands of the past quarter-century represent the latest stage of a trend that has been picking up speed for more than 100 years. Starting in the early decades of the 20th century, school, work and even the routines of daily life became more cognitively complex: less grounded in the concrete and more bound up in the theoretical and abstract. For a time, humanity was able to with this development, resourcefully finding ways to use the brain better. As their everyday environments grew more intellectually demanding, people responded by upping their cognitive game. Continual engagement with the mental rigors of modern life coincided in many parts of the world with improving nutrition, rising living conditions and reduced exposure to pathogens. These factors produced a century-long climb in average I.Q. scores — a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect, after James Flynn, the political philosopher who identified it.

But this upward trajectory is now leveling off. In recent years, I.Q. scores have stopped rising or have even begun to drop…Some researchers suggest that we have pushed our mental equipment as far as it can go. It may be that “our brains are already working at near-optimal capacity,” write the neuroscientist Peter Reiner and his student Nicholas Fitz in the journal Nature. Efforts to wrest more intelligence from this organ, they add, “bump up against the hard limits of neurobiology.” This collision point — where the urgent imperatives of contemporary life confront the stubbornly intractable limits of the brain — is the place where we live at the moment, and rather unhappily. Our determination to drive the brain ever harder is the source of the agitation we feel as we attempt the impossible each day.

Fortunately, there is an alternative. It entails inducing the brain to play a different role: less workhorse, more orchestra conductor. Instead of doing so much in our heads, we can seek out ways to shift mental work onto the world around us and to supplement our limited neural resources with extraneural ones. These platforms for offloading, these resources for supplementation, are readily available and close at hand…

We, too, extend our minds, but not as well as we could. We do it haphazardly, without much intention or skill — and it’s no wonder this is the case. Our efforts at education and training, as well as management and leadership, are aimed principally at promoting brain-bound thinking. Beginning in elementary school, we are taught to sit still, work quietly, think hard — a model for mental activity that will dominate during the years that follow, through high school and college and into the workplace. The skills we develop and the techniques we are taught are mostly those that involve using our individual, unaided brains: committing information.

The limits of this approach have become painfully evident. The days when we could do it all in our heads are over. Our knowledge is too abundant, our expertise too specialized, our challenges too enormous. The best chance we have to thrive in the extraordinarily complex world we’ve created is to allow that world to assume some of our mental labor. Our brains can’t do it alone.

Annie Murphy Paul, from “How to Think Outside Your Brain (June 11, 2021)

Comments

  1. This is incredibly powerful and makes so much sense. We all feel it on some level

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I hear what Ms. Paul is saying and I agree to a degree. But (am maybe this is just personal paranoia), I also hear undertones of increased reliance on AI and a certain relinquishment of control that makes me uneasy. I just finished reading Sherry Turkle’s latest book, ‘The Empathy Diaries,’ in which she talks about the consequences of our rapturous embrace of technology (among other things). Not saying it’s all bad, but can’t help wondering, ‘to what end?’ I Worry that we have become so obsessed with smarter/better/quicker/more clever that we are losing our ability to relish life’s simple pleasures. Nothing wrong with optimizing one’s mental capacity, but hate to lose the joy along the way…..

    Liked by 2 people

  3. WLS…I read this article too…and I definitely agree that we need more orchestra and less workhorse. But there is something to be said for problem solving and doing so without Big Blue derivatives. It has an energy as well…again, I’m still on the side of a greater appreciation of the aesthetic.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Reblogged this on It Is What It Is and commented:
    Very wise words … and more! … “The best chance we have to thrive in the extraordinarily complex world we’ve created is to allow that world to assume some of our mental labor. Our brains can’t do it alone.” — Annie Murphy Paul, from “How to Think Outside Your Brain (nytimes.com, June 11, 2021).

    Liked by 1 person

  5. There are times when I read your posts, David, and am glad you are doing some of my thinking for me.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. She spoke of the elephant in many rooms. I’m not sure what solution she is going for, but I couldn’t help thinking that we need to use technology (if we’ve decided we can’t live without it) more in a brainstorming, crowd-solving way. I think that’s one good thing that came out of the pandemic. We realized what could be done even without a physical boardroom, but we were also hungry now for input, and individually grew more group-friendly.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Sure, we can’t “do it all in our heads” anymore, but I think the opposite has also happened where we do very little in our heads. Why memorize the multiplication tables when you have a calculator? Then one day you don’t have your gadget with you and you need to figure out how much 7 X 8 is, you realize we are getting dumbed down. Who needs to spell anymore? That’s what spellcheckers are for. I’m afraid we are getting stupider from lack of brain use.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: